THE PROBLEM
The existing tank lining in the wet had broken down, allowing the concrete structure to be attacked and broken down by hydrogen sulphide/biogenic sulphuric acid
The existing tank lining in the wet had broken down, allowing the concrete structure to be attacked and broken down by hydrogen sulphide/biogenic sulphuric acid
Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) attacks concrete primarily through a chemical process known as microbial-induced concrete corrosion (MIC), or more specifically, sulfuric acid attack. This problem is especially prevalent in environments such as wastewater treatment plants, sewers, and other systems where hydrogen sulfide gas can be generated. Here’s how the process works in detail:
In environments where organic matter decomposes anaerobically (in the absence of oxygen), sulfate-reducing bacteria (e.g., Desulfovibrio) convert sulfates present in wastewater into hydrogen sulfide gas. This gas can accumulate in sewer systems or treatment tanks, often under stagnant or low-oxygen conditions.
Hydrogen sulfide is a gas that, when it comes into contact with moisture or water, can dissolve and form sulfurous acid (H₂SO₃). This weak acid in itself is not very aggressive, but it’s a precursor to a more harmful process.
Certain aerobic bacteria (e.g., Thiobacillus species) thrive in environments where hydrogen sulfide is present. These bacteria, which are found on the damp surfaces of the sewer, convert hydrogen sulfide gas into sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) in the presence of oxygen. This occurs in the upper parts of sewer pipes, manholes, and other infrastructure exposed to H₂S.
Once sulfuric acid is formed, it reacts aggressively with the calcium compounds in concrete. Concrete is primarily made of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)₂), which is highly alkaline and provides the concrete’s durability and resistance. Sulfuric acid reacts with calcium hydroxide and other cementitious materials, forming calcium sulfate (gypsum), a weak, brittle material, and other byproducts like ettringite. These chemical reactions weaken the concrete over time.
Key Reactions:
The formation of gypsum and ettringite causes the concrete to become soft, brittle, and porous. As the sulfuric acid continues to erode the cement matrix, the concrete starts to crack, spall, and lose its structural integrity. Over time, this leads to severe surface deterioration, loss of strength, and eventually structural failure if left unchecked.
Summary of Effects:
Conclusion:
Hydrogen sulfide attacks concrete through a chain of biochemical and chemical reactions that lead to the formation of sulfuric acid. This acid severely degrades the calcium compounds in the concrete, causing a reduction in strength and eventual structural failure. Effective mitigation strategies involve improving ventilation, using acid-resistant materials, and applying protective coatings to prevent hydrogen sulfide from coming into contact with the concrete.
We proposed the removal of the existing linings and the application of Sikagard M790 – a highly chemical resistant, crack bridging and vapor permeable tank lining.
Being vapor permeable this tank lining has been specifically designed with below ground structures such as wet wells in mind as ground water can lead to osmotic blistering and tank lining failure with vapor impermeable tank linings.
When repairing degraded concrete structures it is best practice in line with EN1504 to test for contaminants such as chlorides and sulfates. Unfortunately in this instance this was not possible as to gain access to the wet well costly over pumping had to be installed and our client required this to be in place for as short a duration as possible to minimise environmental risk.
Initially the existing coatings and degraded concrete were removed by method of abrasive blasting.
Defects in the concrete were made good using Sika Concrete Repair materials and a cementitious fairing coat applied throughout the wet well in preparation for the new tank lining.
Because Sikagard P770 primer can be applied to substrates with unlimited moisture content the hydration time following the concrete repairs was minimal.
As part of our standard quality assurance climatic monitoring was undertaken to ensure compliance with the manufacturers recommendations.
Sikagard M790 was then applied in two coats of contrasting colour as per good tank lining practice. Each coat was applied to a nominal thickness of 500 microns, checked during application using wet film thickness combs
As part our standard quality assurance the cured lining was checked for pin holing using a DC Holiday spark tester. In an aggressive environment such as a wet well, a single pin hole in a tank lining will allow aggressive chemicals to reach the substrate and degradation commence again.
Any pin holes found were made good using the same tank lining material applied by brush.